Photostories: Applications of a Participatory Photography Methodology for Social Science Research

Gomez Ricardo
online access from EBSCOhost eBook Collection
check holdings in CityU LibraryFind
check resources on the same subject in CityU LibraryFind

In today's complex and interconnected world, understanding the lived experiences of underserved and marginalized communities is of paramount importance. Traditional qualitative research methods often fall short in capturing the rich, multifaceted narratives of these communities. This book seeks to address this gap by introducing "Photostories" as an innovative and transformative method for conducting qualitative research.

Photostories harness the power of participatory photography to enable individuals from underserved and marginalized communities to visually articulate their stories, experiences, and perspectives. “Photostories” aims to be a pioneering resource for researchers, educators, and practitioners seeking to add a participatory visual method to their menu of research approaches, while at the same time offering ways to empower marginalized communities and amplify their voices through the transformative power of photography. By delving into the nuances of Photostories, readers will gain valuable insights into a groundbreaking research method that has the potential to reshape the way we conduct qualitative research and engage with underserved populations.

Scholars in the social sciences, anthropology, sociology, psychology, and related disciplines will benefit from the methodological insights, practical guidance, and case studies presented in the book.

(Excerpt from amazon.com)

越線的韓國人, 劃線的日本人 : 用心理學觀點剖析韓日兩國

韓民
check holdings in CityU LibraryFind
check resources on the same subject in CityU LibraryFind

最令韓國人自卑的是日本人?
日本人其實不了解韓國人？
用最幽默輕鬆的角度 帶你認識兩國文化

有時候看起來一模一樣，有時候又天差地別，
跟著文化心理學者，揭開韓國人與日本人的性格行為之謎。
韓國人為什麼在演唱會激動一起跟唱，而日本人只緩緩悠悠地鼓掌？
韓國為什麼發展千奇百怪、五花八門的髒話，而日本的髒話只有一種？
韓國的英雄為什麼多是雞鳴狗盜之輩，而日本的英雄卻只強調「強壯」？
韓國為什麼這麼多「正義魔人」？日本動漫中的主角為什麼執著於「必殺技」？

吃播大國韓國碰上A片大國日本，是越線性格還是劃線特質？
辣姐吃香的韓國對照萌妹吃香的日本，呈現他們對女性的態度？
表情生動的韓國面具跟面無表情的日本面具，說出什麼樣的「人際關係」？
從台灣看日本和韓國，我們以為有理解，但可能大都是誤解。

當韓流與哈日來到了黃金交叉點，文化心理學家從人類普遍需求的應對方式，如社會現象、風俗、價值觀，以及電視劇、電影、動漫等大眾與庶民文化進行全面深層剖析，如果你要交一個日本或韓國朋友，透過這本書讓我們開始先認識他們潛藏的文化個性。

(摘錄自博客來網路書店)

The Vegetarian

Han Kang
check holdings in CityU LibraryFind
check resources by the same author in CityU LibraryFind

FROM HAN KANG, WINNER OF THE 2024 NOBEL PRIZE IN LITERATURE

“[Han Kang’s] intense poetic prose . . . exposes the fragility of human life.”—The Nobel Committee for Literature, in the citation for the Nobel Prize

A NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER
WINNER OF THE INTERNATIONAL BOOKER PRIZE

“Ferocious.”—The New York Times Book Review (Ten Best Books of the Year)
“Both terrifying and terrific.”—Lauren Groff
“Provocative [and] shocking.”—The Washington Post

Before the nightmares began, Yeong-hye and her husband lived an ordinary, controlled life. But the dreams—invasive images of blood and brutality—torture her, driving Yeong-hye to purge her mind and renounce eating meat altogether. It’s a small act of independence, but it interrupts her marriage and sets into motion an increasingly grotesque chain of events at home. As her husband, her brother-in-law and sister each fight to reassert their control, Yeong-hye obsessively defends the choice that’s become sacred to her. Soon their attempts turn desperate, subjecting first her mind, and then her body, to ever more intrusive and perverse violations, sending Yeong-hye spiraling into a dangerous, bizarre estrangement, not only from those closest to her, but also from herself.

Celebrated by critics around the world, The Vegetarian is a darkly allegorical, Kafka-esque tale of power, obsession, and one woman’s struggle to break free from the violence both without and within her.

A Best Book of the Year: BuzzFeed, Entertainment Weekly, Wall Street Journal, Time, Elle, The Economist, HuffPost, Slate, Bustle, The St. Louis Dispatch, Electric Literature, Publishers Weekly

(Excerpt from amazon.com)

領導的本質:成為領導人的52堂必修課 (The Disciplined Leader)

約翰‧曼寧 (John Manning)
online access from HyRead eBook
check holdings in CityU LibraryFind
check resources on the same subject in CityU LibraryFind

本書強調領導統御的基本功，是作者長年協助超過十萬名領導者的經驗淬鍊而成，從自我領導、團隊領導、組織領導三大核心出發，簡短精要的52堂課，從論述到重點摘要，並提供你實際行動的計畫，無論你是領導階層、位居管理職，或是有志於更上一層樓、想成為未來領導人的你，本書都是必讀的領導指南！

自律，是成為優秀領導人的第一步！

彼得‧杜拉克說過；「管理是把事情做對，領導則是做對的事情」

成功領導者的共同特質，在於立定目標之後，
能擁有貫徹執行的心態與行動，這一切都仰賴堅持不懈的自我要求和約束。

領導者的最大困難，在於能不能管理好自己！
每個領導人都有很多事要做，但優秀的領導人，會找出「少數要事」，專注其中。
這些重要的事只會占行動的20%，卻會帶來80%的成果。
想提高你的工作效益，有效領導團隊，你的第一步就是找出這些事，並且用自律的態度徹底執行！

邁向真正的領導，這些你做到了嗎？

‧管好你的憂慮
憂慮無法解決問題，只會讓焦躁從你身上傳染給別人，影響團隊士氣。
‧別擋自己的路
成長的最大障礙就是自己，列出你的障礙清單，提出具體的消除辦法。
‧規畫每一天
俗云：「沒計畫就是計畫著失敗！」每天制訂三個目標，就能趕走無謂的不安。
‧換上工作時該有的表情
55%的溝通來自於臉部表情及肢體語言，別讓言語外的舉止透露出不該出現的訊息。
‧不要越線
無論是對下屬、顧客，還是廠商，務必畫下清楚界線，否則麻煩將接踵而至。
‧讓你的團隊成員都知道自己的權責
建立權責系統，賞罰分明，讓優良的表現得到肯定、錯誤的行為得到反省。
‧經常追問為什麼
對真相抱持開放態度。藉由追問為什麼，時時挑戰組織的規範，激發團隊潛能。
‧新想法是要創造未來，而不是造成混亂
新點子不是靈機一動說了就算，從發想和規畫，都要制式化且取得團隊共識！

寫給現在領導人或是未來想成為領導人的你！

(摘錄自博客來網路書店)

Open Access in Theory and Practice: The Theory-Practice Relationship and Openness

Stephen Pinfield, Simon Wakeling, David Bawden, and Lyn Robinson
online access from Ebook Central Open Access Complete
check holdings in CityU LibraryFind
check resources on the same subject in CityU LibraryFind

This book explores the theory and practice of open access, including various mechanisms and models, such as Read and Publish agreements that are driving the movement forward.

Open Access in Theory and Practice investigates the theory-practice relationship in the domain of open access publication and dissemination of research outputs.

Drawing on detailed analysis of the literature and current practice in OA, as well as data collected in detailed interviews with practitioners, policymakers, and researchers, the book discusses what constitutes ‘theory’, and how the role of theory is perceived by both theorists and practitioners. Exploring the ways theory and practice have interacted in the development of OA, the authors discuss what this reveals about the nature of the OA phenomenon itself and the theory-practice relationship.

Open Access in Theory and Practice contributes to a better understanding of OA and, as such, should be of great interest to academics, researchers, and students working in the fields of information science, publishing studies, science communication, higher education policy, business, and economics. The book also makes an important contribution to the debate of the relationship between theory and practice in information science, and more widely across different fields of the social sciences and humanities.

(Excerpt from amazon.com)

CityUHK Library has successfully negotiated a number of Read-and-Publish Agreements to obtain Article Processing Charges (APC) waivers for our CityUHK authors. For more details, please click here.

「新界」原居民的合法傳統權益 (The Lawful Traditional Rights and Interests of the Indigenous Inhabitants of the “New Territories")

章小杉
online access from Open Books Hong Kong 開讀 (About Open Books HK)
online access from HyRead eBook
check holdings in CityU LibraryFind
check resources on the same subject in CityU LibraryFind

近年來，圍繞新界「丁權」的「傳統權益」問題，香港社會時有爭論。所謂「丁權」，是指香港新界原居民的男性後人（即「男丁」），按殖民地時代沿用至今的「小型屋宇政策」（丁屋政策），獲准在新界的私人土地上興建房屋居住。《基本法》第四十條規定：「『新界』原居民的合法傳統權益受香港特別行政區的保護。」但對於何謂「新界原居民的合法傳統權益」，香港特別行政區應如何保護此類權益，《基本法》第四十條並沒有明示。因此，「丁權」的存廢爭議，焦點也就落在其是否《基本法》所指的新界原居民合法傳統權益之上。

「丁權」涉及新界原居民的利益和《基本法》的解釋，特區政府一直未敢妄動。本書作者特以此為主題，嘗試解釋《基本法》第四十條的學理、規範內涵，以釐清「合法傳統權益」的內容。書中提出了一系列的問題：「新界」和原居民由何而來？傳統權益包括哪些？《基本法》對原居民的權益作了何種保障？原居民權益是特權嗎？誰有權解釋《基本法》第四十條？適宜的解釋方法為何？「丁權」屬於合法傳統權益嗎？調整「丁屋政策」非修改《基本法》不可嗎？

「丁權」問題多年來已為特區政府造地及香港居民帶來困擾及不滿。作者透過回顧大量文獻，逐一解答以上問題，同時考察了《基本法》第四十條的起草過程和歷史背景，以探明立法原意，梳理了「新界」原居民權益可能面臨的憲制挑戰，冀能為此議題提供客觀、中立的法學研究，並嘗試探尋特區政府在其自治權限內調整此一「新界」政策的空間。對《基本法》及新界研究有興趣的人士，本書值得參考。

(摘錄自cityu.edu.hk/upress)